News:

We have upgraded the forums, still a work in progress, if you are having issues, please email [email protected]

Main Menu

Cw is scary good

Started by Sixtynine, March 03, 2012, 04:17:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sixtynine

Go to games before you make judgements. For all you that read box scores, hahahahahaha. "scary good"!!!!!!
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

Star trac

Quote from: Sixtynine on March 03, 2012, 04:17:43 PM
Go to games before you make judgements. For all you that read box scores, hahahahahaha. "scary good"!!!!!!
I agree.....this is why you don't declare victory at the start of the season.  CW is definitely a good team...but today they saw a real pitcher and a team that made plays behind him...
The TRAC.....it's five year mission - to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations - to boldly go where no man has gone before....

CWClassof2007

I don't remember anyone declaring the section champs. Anyone can get beat at anytime. Especially when you have games between rivals like this. I don't think anyone can understand the rivalry between these two schools unless you went to one of them & played in the games against each other.

Sixtynine

Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

UnbiasedOne

CW is scary good 1-9 in that lineup...that is unless you have a pitcher with a 70 mph fastball backed up by off speed in the low 60's.  That would make even Buchanan look "soft" sixty-nine!  Buchanan had their day for sure but how about giving credit where credit is due.  Seen them both and I would take CW in a three game series dude.
I drive really slow in the ultra fast lane while people behind me are going insane!  I'm an A******!

CWClassof2007

Quote from: UnbiasedOne on March 10, 2012, 08:46:00 PM
CW is scary good 1-9 in that lineup...that is unless you have a pitcher with a 70 mph fastball backed up by off speed in the low 60's.  That would make even Buchanan look "soft" sixty-nine!  Buchanan had their day for sure but how about giving credit where credit is due.  Seen them both and I would take CW in a three game series dude.
The Central Section needs to go to a best of three championship like the Sac-Joaquin does.

eartotheground

Hey 69'er: Guess who the new number one team in the valley is now! If you didn't guess CW your brain dead.

antpatce

Quote from: CWClassof2007 on March 10, 2012, 08:48:10 PM
The Central Section needs to go to a best of three championship like the Sac-Joaquin does.
[/quote
They even go a step further, I believe, and have a 2 out of 3 semi-final series between north and south winners.
I played in the Sac-Joaquin baseball playoffs nearly 40 years ago and even then the format was a 16 team, double elimination tournament to decide the champion. And it was large schools + medium schools in the same tourney..
The CS certainly needs to get a format more closely related to the 21st century.

Sixtynine

Quote from: eartotheground on March 11, 2012, 10:17:53 AM
Hey 69'er: Guess who the new number one team in the valley is now! If you didn't guess CW your brain dead.

I still think Buchanan should be number 1 until they are knocked off by a valley team. Isnt that what Valley rankings are?? Question for you sir.... Does Campolindo and Buena participate in valley playoffs?
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

Sixtynine

and not to mention, Buchanan is 4 runs better than CW right now.... that could change though
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

CWClassof2007

Quote from: Sixtynine on March 11, 2012, 12:45:04 PM
and not to mention, Buchanan is 4 runs better than CW right now.... that could change though

March 23rd at Buchanan. CW has actually played better at Buchanan over the last few years than at home.

Sixtynine

Quote from: CWClassof2007 on March 11, 2012, 12:47:01 PM
March 23rd at Buchanan. CW has actually played better at Buchanan over the last few years than at home.

I agree with that, weird that its like that. And with Fergie pitching, i think CW wins that game.
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

UnbiasedOne

Quote from: Sixtynine on March 11, 2012, 12:37:17 PM
I still think Buchanan should be number 1 until they are knocked off by a valley team. Isnt that what Valley rankings are?? Question for you sir.... Does Campolindo and Buena participate in valley playoffs?

And you have a bias...I don't.  I have seen them both and Buchanan got the better of CW that day but things have changed since then. 
I drive really slow in the ultra fast lane while people behind me are going insane!  I'm an A******!

Sixtynine

Quote from: UnbiasedOne on March 11, 2012, 07:43:07 PM
And you have a bias...I don't.  I have seen them both and Buchanan got the better of CW that day but things have changed since then. 

Buchanan needs to be ranked number 1 till they get knocked off my a valley team. I have them going 1-2 their next 3 games, so until they lose those, im not sure how they cant be #1
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

CWClassof2007

Quote from: Sixtynine on March 11, 2012, 10:13:14 PM
Buchanan needs to be ranked number 1 till they get knocked off my a valley team. I have them going 1-2 their next 3 games, so until they lose those, im not sure how they cant be #1

You think they're going to lose 2 of their next three which are against Central, Clovis East & Clovis West. But you still think they should be #1??? I really don't get it.

Sixtynine

Quote from: CWClassof2007 on March 11, 2012, 10:20:49 PM
You think they're going to lose 2 of their next three which are against Central, Clovis East & Clovis West. But you still think they should be #1??? I really don't get it.

Right now they need to be #1. Yes i think theyll lose those game, but they havent happened yet. Until the games are played, and they do in fact lose, theres no reason for them to drop
Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

Sixtynine

#16
Quote from: CWClassof2007 on March 11, 2012, 10:20:49 PM
You think they're going to lose 2 of their next three which are against Central, Clovis East & Clovis West. But you still think they should be #1??? I really don't get it.

When college football polls rank teams, and see their schedule, they dont drop them down cause they see a potential loss the next week.  They vote em right where they think, then re evaluate the next week. Pretty Simple

And i hate to do this......... Buuuuuuuut.........

Just my opinion, but my opinion is right

antpatce

Quote from: Sixtynine on March 11, 2012, 10:13:14 PM
Buchanan needs to be ranked number 1 till they get knocked off my a valley team. I have them going 1-2 their next 3 games, so until they lose those, im not sure how they cant be #1
Bullard already beat Buchanan this year so there goes your theory.

Love TheFn Game

Sixty9: Bullard beat Buchanan already (know your in-section opponents) and CW beat Bullard by 2 touch downs, so that's why CW is #1.  I'll take CW to beat Buchanan 2 out of 3 this year, no problem.  Anyway, Buchanan isn't even ranked #2, they are #3.

CWClassof2007

Quote from: Love TheFn Game on March 12, 2012, 07:46:34 AM
Sixty9: Bullard beat Buchanan already (know your in-section opponents) and CW beat Bullard by 2 touch downs, so that's why CW is #1.  I'll take CW to beat Buchanan 2 out of 3 this year, no problem.  Anyway, Buchanan isn't even ranked #2, they are #3.
I think I'd still put Buchanan ahead of Bullard. They split their two meetings.

CWClassof2007